Coal interests, miners banking on Trump to emphasize fossil fuels

Last Updated by RMPBS News Staff on

Donald Trump promised sweeping reforms to the energy industry during the campaign. He vowed to bring back coal jobs, boost domestic oil and gas production, while repealing climate change regulations and gutting the Environmental Protection Agency. Essentially, his plan aims to reverse much of what the Obama administration delivered on energy and climate in the last eight years. Now that Trump is the president-elect, how much of that will he actually be able to do? These are some of the biggest challenges President Trump is likely to face on the energy front:


After Trump’s victory, coal company stocks surged.

But there is broad agreement that his bold claim that he will bring back coal jobs is unlikely to be fulfilled. President Trump may staunch the bleeding, but he will not be able to restore this sector of the American economy.

In recent years, natural gas has been coal’s biggest enemy, as fracking unleashed vast reserves that sent prices tumbling to record lows, making natural gas-fired electricity cheap. Hundreds of coal-fired power plants have been converted to natural gas plants, or been shut down and replaced. Once those plants are closed, they typically don’t reopen, and there are currently no new coal-fired power plants in the pipeline. Still, there will likely be some kind of emissions regulations imposed on the power sector in the future. In their long-term planning, which goes far beyond Trump’s presidency, utilities will probably continue to hedge their bets against coal.

Trump could have some influence on the regulation front, but repealing existing regulations would be difficult, and drawn out. He could, however, easily lift the federal government’s three year moratoriumon coal leasing on federal land, as well as end the federal government’s recently announced efforts to strengthen regulations that ensure companies, not taxpayers, are on the hook for cleanup costs. The former would not do much for the coal industry’s bottom-line, since companies operating on federal land already have decades worth of coal under lease, and have shown little interest of late in leasing more. The latter could have some impact, but many of the biggest would-be beneficiaries are currently subject to court-ordered agreements that likely wouldn’t allow them to take advantage of any regulatory changes.


Trump has pledged to rescind the Obama administration’s Clean Power Plan, an EPA rule aimed at reducing carbon emissions from existing power plants. That plan would have accelerated the move away from coal-fired power plants. It is currently on hold while the courts consider legal challenges. If the plan is upheld, there are a number of legal or congressional actions that the Trump administration could take to gut or repeal the plan. If the plan is struck down by the court, the administration could simply not defend it. Either way, the plan is almost certainly dead.

There are numerous reports that Trump has selected a noted climate change skeptic, Myron Ebell, to head up his transition plans for the EPA. Ebell has called the Clean Power Plan illegal. Trump has also pledged to scale back the EPA and reduce its regulatory functions.


In addition to the Ebell pick, Trump is putting together a transition team dominated by fossil fuel lobbyists and climate change skeptics. His cabinet picks are reported to include a host of prominent Republicans who have consistently fought the Obama administration’s climate actions. He has called climate change a hoax and has promised to pull out of the Paris Climate Accord. In Morocco, where negotiators are meeting this week to hammer out the details of implementing the accord, Trump’s victory was met with deep concern.  According to Dana Fisher of the University of Maryland, quoted in the AP: “The Paris Agreement and any U.S. leadership in international climate progress is dead.”

On a conference call organized on Wednesday afternoon by the environmental group World Resources Institute, a number of climate activists expressed cautious optimism that the Trump administration would come around to accepting the science of climate change and the economics of clean energy. It was optimism leavened with fervent hope. Andrew Steer, President and CEO of WRI, opined that the U.S. has played a “major leadership role of the last four years” in climate change initiatives. “We wouldn’t have Paris without U.S. leadership,” he said, “we are hoping and praying the U.S. will not relinquish this.”

Although technically simple for Trump to effectively withdrawn from the Paris Accord, he will likely face immense pressure from other countries, including China, not to do so.

Oil executives were giddy with the Trump victory. The Washington Post quoted Stephen Brown, vice president of government relations for Tesoro, who predicted that obstacles and “procedural hurdles” to infrastructure projects like pipelines would be reexamined and regulations about the social cost of carbon and other environmental impacts would be “gone.”

Still the industry faces its own challenges that no President can solve. Record production in the Middle East and the United States has left the market overflowing with crude oil, which in turn has pushed down prices significantly. Trump’s plan to boost production even further would only exacerbate the problem and keep prices lower for longer.

More: the Dakota Access Pipeline and slowing the surge of renewables. See the full story here

INSIGHT-Donate.jpg Insight-LOGO.png

Insight with John Ferrugia is in-depth, independent and incisive. John and a team of investigative journalists present thoroughly researched stories of significance to Colorado.